CHARITY SCIENCE FOUNDATION
  • Donate

What does it take to be a skeptical charity?

4/1/2014

Comments

 
Organizational self-confidence is seen as a very positive trait and is often embraced by new start-ups and nonprofits. The concept of self-skepticism is arguably as important but often more neglected. Self-skepticism cautions us to clearly measure our impact before declaring ourselves effective or expanding our organization. We believe that if a healthy dose of this was applied to the charity sector would make the world a much better place much faster. 

Below is an outline of our organizational self-skepticism checklist. It breaks down into two main categories: (1) do not assume a priori that the organization is better than the evidence suggests, and (2) constantly seek and use critical feedback.

Organization does not assume that they are better than the evidence suggests
  1. Not assuming they are far outside the base rate or norm without strong evidence.
  2. Not assuming that the average and the marginal organizational impact will be the same.
  3. Only seeking major funding/expansion/scaling once there is evidence of impact.
  4. Individuals within the organization being skeptical about personal impact until proven otherwise.
  5. Being very careful not to generalize strength in one area to strength in many/all areas.
  6. Not assuming they are having a large impact in all unquantified areas.

Organization seeks and uses critical feedback
  1. Being transparent and seeking feedback on their work.
  2. Being clear with the public about their goals,objective and plans and seeking feedback on them.
  3. Seeking public feedback from critically minded others about their organization and core strategy, and sharing this information publicly.
  4. Getting external reviews and impact evaluations written by critically minded people not working with or for the organization.
  5. Applying major changes when negative results come back from external or internal reviews.
  6. Encouraging feedback on organization and addressing it instead of ignoring or squashing it.
  7. Keeping open the possibility of shutting down if its impact is not proven

We feel as though one of the largest realizations that has made us far more effective was when we started applying a much stronger self-skepticism to our own ideas. Often we can be harsh and critical when it comes to others’ ideas but have a much harder time seriously evaluating our own impact.
Comments

    Archives

    December 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    You also might be interested in our operations blog that details: our month to month organizational progress, the more technical ideas we have, and our board meeting minutes

    Categories

    All
    Advanced Charity Science
    Tips On Giving

    RSS Feed

Charity Science is a foundation registered in Canada under the legal name “Charity Science Foundation of Canada”.
​Our charity number is 80963 6236 RR0001.
Our privacy policy can be found here.

  • Donate