CHARITY SCIENCE FOUNDATION
  • Donate

Fake transparency

6/21/2014

Comments

 
There are two kinds of transparency:
  1. Where the information is technically available but is inconvenient to acquire
  2. Where the information is easily accessible. 
There is a huge difference between these two, but people often think both of them are transparent.

Convenience can make a huge difference. People put junk food on the top shelf because even this small change can make us eat healthier. Studies have also shown that people are convenience maximizers and want to put in as little effort as possible. If something is a step harder there is generally a huge drop off rate. For example charities know that if they want certain pages to get traffic it's good to link them directly from the home page because most people will not be bothered enough to go to a different page to find it.
Picture
If I wanted to make information technically possible to access but I did not really want people to see it, it would be easy to set up a bunch of steps that seem reasonable but will reduce the number of people who end up seeing the information dramatically. Some examples below.

  • Instead of linking the information directly I could say “email me for this information”
  • I put the information on a page that is harder to access; say one that takes 2 or more clicks from any commonly visited webpage.
  • I put the information mixed in with a large amount of other information. For example, I write a 20 page blog post and within it there is buried the information I do not want others to find. 
  • I write summaries of the information that highlight certain areas, and although I do provide the original information it is just as one link at the bottom of the summary.
  • I do not mention the information anywhere publicly but if someone specifically asks for it of course I will send it to them.
  • I keep the information as an “internal doc” and refuse to separate it from the confidential information that is also in the document. I use this as an excuse not to share the document.
  • I put the information out publicly but in a not very readable or understandable form, such as rough notes or raw spreadsheets.

If I were to do any these things the number of people who would follow through would be dramatically reduced. I do not think all charities do this deliberately, although I know for a fact that some do, but any of these kinds of steps reduced an organizations transparency. It's very important to realize the difference between possible and practical transparency.
Comments

    Archives

    December 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013

    You also might be interested in our operations blog that details: our month to month organizational progress, the more technical ideas we have, and our board meeting minutes

    Categories

    All
    Advanced Charity Science
    Tips On Giving

    RSS Feed

Charity Science is a foundation registered in Canada under the legal name “Charity Science Foundation of Canada”.
​Our charity number is 80963 6236 RR0001.
Our privacy policy can be found here.

  • Donate